The general structure of the writing of educational papers should be short, clear and general. Through the title, readers can roughly understand the content and characteristics of the paper. The number of words in the title should be appropriate, generally not more than 20 words, if some details must be put in the title. In this small series to share with you the general rules of the writing structure of educational papers.
There are general rules in the writing of educational research papers, which are generally composed of three parts in the text structure, namely, introduction (lead), text and conclusion. From the logical point of view of the content, educational research papers generally need to answer four questions: what is it? Why is that? How to do? How's that? However, a paper on the four questions is not the average force to elaborate, sometimes not all four questions to answer.
Due to the different themes and emphases of papers, the main structure and content of educational research papers are different when they are written.
Front-line teachers' papers are more about their own practice, so the theme and focus should generally be on how to answer the question, that is, the main body of the text should be the content of practical operation strategy. Such a paper, the introduction part is best to answer two questions, first of all, what is elaborated -- that is, for your practice strategy of the core concept is what, to give their own understanding or operational definition; Then talk briefly about why -- the significance and value of your choice of a practice strategy. This section should be concise, preferably within one-fifth of the text. The main part should classify the operation strategy according to certain logic, and then describe the operation process and key points, supplemented by practical cases. The conclusion is to answer how, that is, the positive results of your practice and the evidence. Results should be organized into a systematic expression, evidence should be used to speak with facts, not general "achieved good results", "students have been developed" and other vague content.
For the educational papers focusing on the innovation and development of cognition, the main questions to be answered are "what" and "why", so the main body of the text should first be the comprehensive definition of the concept -- need to clear the connotation, extension, basic characteristics of the concept and other aspects of the content; Then it expounds the value and significance of this understanding, that is, the premise and theoretical basis of knowledge, and the guiding significance of knowledge to practice. Such a paper, the introduction part should generally briefly describe the background of the discovery of cognitive problems and the main problems. The conclusion part can expound the theoretical innovation and contribution of new understanding.
The main body of the paper is about the "how" of the paper, the main part of the exposition is the effect of practice, the need to classify the effect according to certain logic, and then according to the category of the main results are described, put out evidence (facts, data or cases). The introduction should briefly explain the process of practice and the method of collecting effective materials. The conclusion can talk about the enlightenment of these practical achievements and the value of promotion.
The research topic is mainly a theoretical discussion of "what is", and the introduction part should generally be a brief exposition of the problems and deficiencies existing in the existing theoretical understanding. This "introduction" can also be detailed to form the first part of the paper. In this way, the introduction can lead to the research topic from the perspective of the problem background. The main part of the thesis should expound the innovation of researchers' cognition in view of the existing problems and deficiencies in cognition. In the conclusion part, it is necessary to refine and elaborate the main conclusions of the developed cognition content, and appropriately talk about the significance and value of the new ideas.