Your current browser version is out of date, in order not to affect your use, it is recommended that you use the latest Google Browser, Firefox browser, 360 browser, after changing the browser use more smoothly! (note! Dual-core browser please switch to speed mode)
21 July 2022
What are the formats for replying to sci editors?

When we complete the paper and submit it, we will usually receive a reply from the editor of the sci journal after a period of time. Usually, the letter will give suggestions for revision of the paper. At this time, we just need to revise and submit the manuscript according to the suggestions. Are there any format requirements for the sci journal editor's reply? Let me talk to you in detail below.

sci revised the problem of naming the reply letter. Everyone seems to like to start with "Dear Editor". Although there is nothing wrong with this general file format, when you use "Dear Dr.XX", the editor will be happier, because Scholars care more about their academic research level than the editor's true identity, so paying attention to the title will give your letter a lot of points.

Secondly, the revision letter must be detailed. What is the detailed specification? A standard is that even if the reviewer does not read the revised manuscript, he can understand what you have changed by reading the letter immediately. All the revised content must match the actual meaning of the revision suggestion, and it should be marked on the letter. Even if the suggestions of the two reviewers are repeated, they must be answered separately. It is not inconvenient. If the text in the sci is modified more, it can be Put a number of larger revisions on the letter.

The latter point is that the reply letter should be meticulous. No matter how small the problem is, it must be carefully revised and responded to. When your reply letter is read carelessly and carelessly, the editor will also suspect the quality of the content of your article.

Writing of the reply letter: 1. At the beginning of the reply letter, you should show the topic type of the paper and the serial number of the article submission, and thank the reviewers and revision comments with a small number of papers. 2. Reply to the revision opinions of authoritative experts step by step. If you plan to separate the step-by-step replies, you can succinctly list the key changes made based on the review comments, and then answer the questions in steps. Put the reply on the letter, and you can say that the reply will come later.

In general, you should pay attention to the three points of title, detail, and meticulousness when carrying out a sci revision reply. Although the final acceptance depends on the quality of the content of the article, the revision reply all account for the weight.

The above is the relevant knowledge sharing of the editor. If you need to know more related content, you can enter our website to search for keywords or contact the editor on the site.