What should we pay attention to when polishing SCI papers? How do we need to polish it? The following editor has sorted out some points that should be paid attention to when retouching SCI papers, hoping to help you.

　　1、 Find the place that cannot be changed

　　Many people do not know what is good to modify when retouching and revising English papers, so they have to correct the whole article, which is time-consuming and laborious. They have not only corrected the previous shortcomings, but also deleted the essence by mistake. Arbitrary deletion can't find a key point of modification, which can only show that you don't understand your article thoroughly. Maybe you really should spend more time thinking deeply about your central idea and figure out what conclusion you want to express, so that you can clearly know what can't be deleted when modifying.

　　2、 Neglect experiment

　　The conclusions we get when writing SCI papers must be based on accurate experimental results. When we revise SCI papers, we should pay attention to this link in the final written presentation of the papers. Try to describe the process of each experiment clearly, and how you deduce the conclusion of the SCI paper through the experimental results. The causal dialectical relationship between the experiment and the conclusion can let the reviewer see your grasp of the experiment.

　　3、 Excessive processing

　　When reviewing a SCI paper, the first thing the reviewer should check is the repetition of the paper, that is, whether you plagiarize others' articles. In addition to some paragraphs that have been marked with quotations, repetition is allowed. If a large number of repetition is found in other parts, your paper will be directly judged as failing, and even be subject to other penalties, such as prohibiting you from submitting SCI papers within a few years, If that's the case, you can't lose. Therefore, many people become too careful when modifying SCI papers. In order to avoid repetition, they over modified their articles, which blurred the central idea of the paper and confused the reviewers.

　　The formation of an English paper always needs constant adjustment and revision to get the opportunity to see the journal, so when you see the revised letter, you don't have to worry too much about whether there is something wrong with your scientific research achievements. After receiving the modification letter, you need to calm down at the first time to see what the other party's modification suggestions are. In order to prevent forgetting, you can write them down. After that, according to these opinions, revise them one by one, and then polish them. I believe your paper will soon pass the examination.